Big brother logic: logical modeling and reasoning about agents equipped with surveillance cameras in the plane
نویسندگان
چکیده
We consider multi-agent scenarios where each agent controls a surveillance camera positioned in the plane, with fixed position and angle of view, but rotating freely. The agents can thus observe the surroundings and each other. They can also reason about each other’s observation abilities and knowledge derived from these observations. We introduce suitable logical languages for reasoning about such scenarios which involve atomic formulae stating what agents can see, multi-agent epistemic operators for individual, distributed and common knowledge, as well as dynamic operators reflecting the ability of cameras to turn around in order to reach positions satisfying formulae in the language. We introduce semantics of our basic logic BBL and its extensions on natural geometric models, as well as formal Kripke semantics for them in vision-based finite abstractions of the geometric models. We discuss the expressiveness of our logical languages and provide their translations in PDL style. Using these translations we develop algorithms and obtain complexity results for model checking and satisfiability testing for BBL and its extensions. Notably, we show that even for the extension with common knowledge, model checking remains in PSPACE. Finally, we discuss some further extensions: by adding obstacles, positioning the cameras in 3D or enabling them to change positions.
منابع مشابه
Big Brother Logic: Logical modeling and reasoning about agents equipped with surveillance cameras in the plane Technical report IRIT/RT–2014-01–FR
We consider multi-agent scenarios where each agent controls a surveillance camera positioned in the plane, with fixed position and angle of view, but rotating freely. The agents can thus observe the surroundings and each other. They can also reason about each other’s observation abilities and knowledge derived from these observations. We introduce suitable logical languages for reasoning about ...
متن کاملBig brother logic: reasoning about agents equipped with surveillance cameras in the plane (demonstration)
We consider multi-agent scenarios where each agent controls a surveillance camera positioned in the plane, with fixed position and angle of view, but rotating freely. The agents can thus observe the surroundings and each other. They can also reason about each other’s observation abilities and knowledge derived from these observations. In this demonstration, cameras are located in the plane. The...
متن کاملExtending the Qualitative Trajectory Calculus Based on the Concept of Accessibility of Moving Objects in the Paths
Qualitative spatial representation and reasoning are among the important capabilities in intelligent geospatial information system development. Although a large contribution to the study of moving objects has been attributed to the quantitative use and analysis of data, such calculations are ineffective when there is little inaccurate data on position and geometry or when explicitly explaining ...
متن کاملA Logic for Reasoning about Explicit Knowledge in Finite Agents (Abstract)
The Problem Epistemic logics are logics for reasoning about knowledge in systems of agents. Traditional modal epistemic logics are information-theoretical, in the sense that they consider knowledge about propositions and that agents know everything that follows from the information they possess. Although proved useful in many applications, this view is unrealistic when modeling explicit knowled...
متن کاملDynamic Epistemic Logic I: Modeling Knowledge and Belief
Dynamic epistemic logic, broadly conceived, is the study of logics of information change. In this first paper, I introduce the basic logical systems for reasoning about the knowledge and beliefs of a group of agents.
متن کامل